The AI engine is offline (last seen Aug 12, 05:02 UTC). Scores are shown as of their timestamps; new theses and refreshes are queued and run the moment it returns.

Macro

Search catalysts, news stories, and pressures, or browse the trust-weighted news feed below.

Home tech energy finance healthcare defense industrial consumer communication utilities real estate raw materials
← back
consumer · sector mood
1993
year mood +0.08 · -0.42 to +0.15 across 12 mo
Monthly mood
bearish −1 +1 bullish
-0.5 -0.25 0 +0.25 +0.5 Jan +0.15 Feb Mar Apr -0.42 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
month values ▾
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
+0.15+0.15+0.15-0.42+0.00+0.05+0.10+0.15+0.15+0.15+0.15+0.15

Consumer sector sentiment is neutral this month despite Marlboro Friday's price cuts and blue-chip brand declines, as broader market stability offsets sector-specific weakness. The price slashing by Philip Morris reflects defensive positioning in a stagnant category, but has not triggered wider profit-margin erosion across consumer staples. Investors shrugged, treating the move as an isolated play rather than a signal of systemic pressure.

How this mood is scored ▾
Each day the model reads that day's news for the sector and asks, as someone who owns assets or makes their living in it: how am I feeling this month, and why? The month's mood is that running answer, tied to the specific events driving it (the story shown above). It leans on trusted, higher-impact reporting, and on the prior month when a month is quiet, so one loud headline can't swing it. The read updates daily through the month; once a month ends, its mood is locked. This year is read live from the news the pipeline actually collected (hover a bar for its story count). · last computed Jul 06, 2026
Top consumer stories of 1993
Apr
Marlboro Friday: Philip Morris slashes cigarette prices, blue-chip brands crater upi.com →

Philip Morris cut Marlboro prices about 20 percent to fight discount brands, and its stock fell more than 20 percent in a day. The move vaporized tens of billions in market value across branded consumer companies as investors questioned the pricing power of premium brands. The episode marked a low point for consumer staples valuations in the decade.